Skip to main content

A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches

Status of Publication: Published/Completed
Date produced: 2016
Authoring organisation/Author affiliation: Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds
Individual author(s): Lucas K, Wee B, Maat K
Type of Resource: Research
Impairment area(s): Pan-impairment
Transport mode(s): Unspecified
Journey stage: Unspecified
Region: United Kingdom (all countries)

Document summary

In this paper, we present the case that traditional transport appraisal methods do not sufficiently capture the social dimensions of mobility and accessibility. However, understanding this is highly relevant for policymakers to understand the impacts of their transport decisions. These dimensions include the distribution of mobility and accessibility levels over particular areas or for specific population groups, as well as how this may affect various social outcomes, including their levels of participation, social inclusion and community cohesion. In response, we propose a method to assess the socially relevant accessibility impacts (SRAIs) of policies in some of these key dimensions. The method combines the use of underlying ethics principles, more specifically the theories of egalitarianism and sufficientarianism, in combination with accessibility-based analysis and the Lorenz curve and Gini index. We then demonstrate the method in a case study example. Our suggestion is that policymakers can use these ethical perspectives to determine the equity of their policies decisions and to set minimum standards for local transport delivery. This will help them to become more confident in the development and adoption of new decision frameworks that promote accessibility over mobility and which also disaggregate the costs and benefits of transport policies over particular areas or for specific under-served population groups.

ncat is not responsible for any content, information or views shared on third party websites. All opinions, statements, or representations made by individuals or external organizations are their own and do not reflect the views or policies of ncat. When using the Resource Collection, if you find any broken links or require help and support, please click to launch an email to resourcecollection@ncat.uk